Disposed¶10

Ananda Raghunath Narote and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC7 Mar 2025ABA/1425/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; speaking to minutes; praecipe; confirmation of interim order dated 17.05.2024; order dated 15.10.2024; additional condition — P.R. Bond and sureties Rs. 10,000/- each; applicants Ananda Raghunath Narote, Samadhan Ashok Narote, Ramdas Ananda Narote, Dattu Ananda Narote, Nilesh Ramdas Narote; State of Maharashtra; Bombay High Court Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction; ABA No. 1425 of 2024; Manish Pitale, J.; decided 07 March 2025.

What did the court decide?

Praecipe disposed of by directing that the order dated 15.10.2024 shall mention confirmation of the interim order dated 17.05.2024 and the anticipatory bail application being allowed, on the applicants furnishing P.R. Bond and sureties of Rs. 10,000/- each as an additional condition; the other conditions in paragraph No.11 of the order continue to operate. ¶10

Ananda Raghunath Narote and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶10

Issue for consideration

Whether, on speaking to the minutes, the order dated 15.10.2024 (which confirmed the interim order dated 17.05.2024 and finally allowed the anticipatory bail application) should record that the allowance is subject to an additional condition of the applicants furnishing P.R. Bond and sureties of Rs. 10,000/- each.

¶7

Court's answer

The order dated 15.10.2024 shall mention confirmation of the interim order dated 17.05.2024 and the anticipatory bail application being allowed.

¶10

Ratio / Principle

Furnishing P.R. Bond and sureties of Rs. 10,000/- each by the applicants is imposed as an additional condition for the application being allowed.

¶13

Key takeaways

The other conditions mentioned in paragraph No.11 of the order dated 15.10.2024 shall continue to operate.ratio¶13
The praecipe stands disposed of.ratio¶14

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1425 of 2024 — Ananda Raghunath Narote and four others v. The State of Maharashtra — High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction — Manish Pitale, J. — 07.03.2025 — Speaking to minutes / praecipe. By order dated 15.10.2024 the Court had confirmed its interim order dated 17.05.2024 (under which the learned APP, on instructions of the Investigating Officer, had stated that the applicants would not be arrested and the applicants were directed to attend the concerned police station for a specific period), as a consequence of which the anticipatory bail application stood finally allowed. On a praecipe for speaking to the minutes of that order, the Court directed that the order dated 15.10.2024 shall mention the confirmation of the interim order and the application being allowed, on the applicants furnishing P.R. Bond and sureties of Rs. 10,000/- each as an additional condition; the other conditions in paragraph No.11 of the order continue to operate. Praecipe stands disposed of.

¶1

P1_ABA_1425_24.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1425 OF 2024

¶3

1. Ananda Raghunath Narote
2. Samadhan Ashok Narote
3. Ramdas Ananda Narote
4. Dattu Ananda Narote
5. Nilesh Ramdas Narote	…	Applicants
vs.
The State of Maharashtra	…	Respondent

¶4

Ms. Savvy Kolhekar, i/b. Mr. Aniket Vagal for applicant.

¶5

CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 07^th MARCH, 2025

¶6

P.C. :

¶7

. Not on board. Mentioned by way of praecipe for speaking to the minutes in respect of order dated 15.10.2024.

¶8

By the said order, this Court confirmed the interim order dated 17.05.2024 passed by this Court, as a consequence of which the anticipatory bail application stood finally allowed.

¶9

The interim order, while granting relief to the applicant, pending the anticipatory bail application, merely recorded the statement of the learned APP, on instructions of the Investigating Officer, that the applicants would not be arrested and this Court, in that backdrop, directed the applicants to attend the concerned police station for specific period of time.

¶10

In that light, the order dated 15.10.2024 shall mention confirmation of the interim order and the application being allowed,

¶11

1/2

¶12

P1_ABA_1425_24.doc

¶13

on the applicants furnishing P.R. Bond and sureties of 10,000 each,₹ as an additional condition for the application being allowed. The other conditions mentioned in paragraph No.11 of the order shall continue to operate.

¶14

5. Praecipe stands disposed of.

¶15

(MANISH PITALE, J)

¶16

PRIYAKAMBLI Digitallysigned byPRIYA KAMBLIDate:2025.03.0718:33:25+0530

¶17

Priya Kambli

¶18

2/2

Ananda Raghunath Narote and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ananda Raghunath Narote and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jang Bahadur Singh Gujral vs Manmohan Kaur Oberoi

Bisleri International Private Limited vs Orion Foods and Beverages

Shri. Dundappa Shivaru Mahar (Since Deceased through Lrs) Smt. Kamalabai Dundappa Baleshgol and Ors. vs Smt. Sonavva W/O Bhimappa Satyanaik and Ors.

Asian Paints Limited vs Sonia Arora Trading as Flora Paint Industry

Kailesh Implex Private Limited vs Idbi Bank Limited

Kailesh Implex Private Limited vs Idbi Bank Limited