Dismissed¶12
Prashant Chandrakant Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra
Anticipatory Bail Application – Dismissal as infructuous
Bombay HCABA/105/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Prashant Chandrakant Pawar v. State of Maharashtra, Anticipatory Bail Application No. 105 of 2025, Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench), decided 22.01.2025 by Arun R. Pedneker, J. Short 'P.C.' order: anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous upon counsel's statement that the applicant had been arrested. Useful only as an example of disposal of an anticipatory bail application on account of subsequent arrest; no ratio on merits, no statutory provisions or precedents discussed.
What did the court decide?
In view of the submission that the applicant has been arrested, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous. ¶12