“There is an important departure made by the Limitation Act, 1963 in sofar as the provision - contained in Section 29, subsection (2), is con cerned. Whereas, under the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, Section 29, sub-section (2), clause (b) provided that for the purpose of determining any - period of limitation prescribed for any suit, ap peal or application by any special or local law, the provisions of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, other than those contained in Sections 4, 9 to 18 and 22, shall not apply and, therefore, the - applicability of Section 5 was in clear and spe cific terms excluded, Section 29, subsection (2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 enacts in so many terms that for the purpose of determining the - period of limitation prescribed for any suit, ap peal or application by any special or local law the provisions contained in Sections 4 to 24, - which would include Section 5, shall apply inso - far as and to the extent to which they are not ex pressly excluded by such special or local law. - Section 29, sub-section (2), clause (b) of the In dian Limitation Act, 1908 specifically excluded the applicability of Section 5, while Section 29, sub-section (2) of the Limitation Act, 1963, in
