Petitioner in a criminal writ petition sought leave to withdraw with liberty to raise all contentions before the framing of charge. The High Court granted leave and disposed of the petition, leaving all contentions of all parties expressly open.
Liberty to withdraw petition with liberty to raise contentions before framing of charge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCR 2 of 2024
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2 OF 2024
NAVIN BANSAL Versus STATE OF GOA THR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AND 2 ORS
... PETITIONER
... RESPONDENTS
Mr Rohan P. Desai with Mr Ashay Priolkar and Ms A. Parrikar, Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr S.G. Bhobe, Public Prosecutor for the Respondent-State. Mr Shivraj Gaonkar with Prabhav Sirvoicar, Advocates for Respondent No.2.
CORAM:- M. S. SONAK & VALMIKI MENEZES, JJ.
DATED :- 8th April, 2024
P.C.:
VALMIKI MENEZES, J.
M. S. SONAK, J.
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SANTOSH SHRIDHAR SHRIDHAR MHAMAL MHAMAL Date: 2024.04.10 15:18:33 +05'30'
Page 1 of 1
8th April, 2024
Navin Bansal
State of Goa thr. Public Prosecutor
Respondent No.2
Respondent No.3
M. S. Sonak
Valmiki Menezes
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
