A criminal writ petition pending since April 2018 was never circulated or pursued by the petitioners or their advocate. The High Court noted the petitioners' apparent lack of interest and dismissed it for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm 46-wp999.2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 999 OF 2018
Pralhad Govindrao Salunkhe-Patil & Ors. …..Petitioners
Vs.
The State Of Maharashtra …..Respondent
None for the Petitioners. Mr. J.P. Yagnik APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ. DATE : 27th FEBRUARY, 2024.
P.C.:-
and/or their Advocate on record have not taken any efforts even to circulate present Petition.
It appears that, Petitioners are not interested in pursuing
present Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
Digitally signed by SANJIV SANJIV SHARNAPPA SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR MASHALKAR Date: 2024.03.04 16:55:46 +0530
1/1
Pralhad Govindrao Salunkhe-Patil & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
Shyam C. Chandak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
