Court allowed leave to withdraw two writ petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra and disposed of them as withdrawn. No substantive legal issue was considered.
Leave to withdraw writ petitions granted; petitions disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:25313-DB
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
937 WRIT PETITION NO. 9899 OF 2024
HEMANT PANDIT DHADE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
AND
938 WRIT PETITION NO. 9973 OF 2024
HARSHAL MADAN DHAYDE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Kishorkumar Bharatrao Borde AGP for Respondent/s – State : Mrs. P.J. Bharad Advocate for Respondent Nos. 5 & 6 : Mr. Dayama Nirmal R.
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ. DATE : 16 OCTOBER 2024
PER COURT :
Learned Advocate for the petitioners, on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the writ petitions.
withdrawn.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ]
Thakur-Chauhan/
HEMANT PANDIT DHADE
HARSHAL MADAN DHAYDE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MANGESH S. PATIL
SHAILESH P. BRAHME
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
