Writ petition filed by the petitioner against the State of Maharashtra; counsel sought permission to withdraw and the Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
501 wp 983-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 983 OF 2024
Sanjay Shankar Landge. Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Others.
...Petitioner.
...Respondents.
Ms. Nikita D. Shelar i/b Mr. Amit G. Kasbe for the Petitioner. Mr. A. R. Metkari, APP for the Respondent-State.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : May 9, 2024.
P. C. :
1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on production board.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioner who is present in the Court, seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
1 of 1
Patil-SR
Signed by: Sachin R. Patil Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 10/05/2024 12:38:51
Sanjay Shankar Landge
The State of Maharashtra
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
