Petition seeking extension of time for the petitioner's surrender was heard and refused by the High Court, which declined to extend the surrender period and disposed of the petition.
No relief granted; extension of time for surrender refused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 27CrWP967.2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
27 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 967 OF 2024
Sameer Noormiya Khilarikar-c/10135
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
Mrs. Sharada Pundlik Chate - Advocate for the Petitioner
Mrs. Govind A. Kulkarni - APP for Respondent/State
CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT
AND
NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
DATED : 10TH JUNE, 2024
PER COURT : -
1.After hearing both the sides, we are not inclined to extend
the time for surrender of the Petitioner.
2.The Petition stands disposed of.
[NEERAJ P. DHOTE] [R. G. AVACHAT]
JUDGE JUDGE
SG Punde
Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 12/06/2024 12:10:54
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should extend the time allowed to the Petitioner for surrender.
Sameer Noormiya Khilarikar
The State Of Maharashtra
R. G. Avachat
Neeraj P. Dhote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court