Petition challenged rejection of a plaint amendment application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC. During pendency the suit was decided; petitioner sought leave to withdraw with liberty to raise these grounds in appeal against the final judgment.
Liberty to raise grounds of the withdrawn petition in the appeal against final disposal of the suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by CHAITANYA CHAITANYA ASHOK ASHOK JADHAV JADHAV Date: 2024.04.01 18:51:10 +0530
18-Wp-9528-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9528 OF 2023
Zamber Maruti Kobal .… Petitioner
Versus
Anadrao Vithoba Kobal And Ors.
.… Respondents
Mr. Nilesh Wable, for the Petitioner.
CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 28th MARCH, 2024
P.C. :
1/2
Chaitanya Jadhav
18-Wp-9528-2023.doc
the said Order 10th April, 2019, has been challenged, the Regular Civil Suit No. 87 of 2007 has been decided by the Civil Judge Junior Division, Khed-Rajgurunagar, District Pune, by its Judgment dated 11th October, 2023. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner tender a copy of the Judgment passed by the Trial Court. The same is taken on record and marked “ X ” for identification.
MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.
2/2
Chaitanya Jadhav
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Zamber Maruti Kobal
Anadrao Vithoba Kobal
Manjusha Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
