Dilip Madhavrao Shinde v. Shivaji Ramkishan Shinde
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition withdrawn at petitioner's request on counsel's instructions; court dismissed it as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp9484.24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
901 WRIT PETITION NO. 9484 OF 2023
Dilip Madhavrao Shinde ….Petitioner VERSUS Shivaji Ramkishan Shinde …..Respondent
Mr. T. M. Venjane, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. K. V. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 14th NOVEMBER, 2024.
PER COURT :
1. Learned counsel for Petitioner, on instructions, seeks
withdrawal of the Petition.
2. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
( R. M. JOSHI) Judge
dyb
Dilip Madhavrao Shinde
Shivaji Ramkishan Shinde
R. M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court