Vehicle loan petition against bank recovery: respondents reported one-time settlement of dues and closure of the petitioner's vehicle loan account, with email instructions placed on record. Nothing survived; the court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-WP-9462-2017.docx
rrpillai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9462 OF 2017
Shri Deepak Govind Mahadik … Petitioner
Vs.
Deputy / Asst. Registrar and Others … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Aniruddha A. Garge i/b. Mr. Jitendra Oak for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
Mr. S. L. Babar, AGP for the State – Respondent No. 1.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 9th JANUARY 2024
P.C.
1. Even today none appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel
appearing for respondent no. 1 states that the claim of the bank is
settled and the bank has received the dues by way of one time settlement.
Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2024.01.10 09:38:18 +0530
RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI
1/2
2-WP-9462-2017.docxno. 2 has placed on record copy of the email instructions received by him from the bank. The same is taken on record.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives after the respondent bank settled the loan dues and closed the vehicle loan account.
Shri Deepak Govind Mahadik
Deputy / Asst. Registrar
GAURI GODSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court