Dismissed

Smt. Luismari Fasku Dsouza Thr. Poa Manvel Fasku Dsouza v. Abu Razak Shaikh and Ors.

Bombay HC23 Jan 2024WP/946/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Writ Petition No. 946 of 2024, the court dismissed a petition challenging a Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal order dated 1981. The petitioner's explanation for laches and delay was found insufficient, leading to the petition being rejected on procedural grounds.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed with no costs awarded.

Smt. Luismari Fasku Dsouza Thr. Poa Manvel Fasku Dsouza… — Landlord and Tenant | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

12-wp-946-2024.doc

¶2

Nikita

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

NIKITA KAILAS DARADE

¶5

Digitally signed byNIKITA KAILAS DARADE Date: 2024.01.23 16:18:27 +0530

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.946 OF 2024

¶7

Luismari Fasku D’souza Thr. POA
Manvel Fasku D’souza… Petitioner
V/s.

¶8

Abu Razak Shaikh and Ors.… Respondents

¶9

Mr. Vilas B. Tapkir, for the Petitioner.
Mrs. V.S. Nimbalkar, AGP for the State-Respondent
No.5.

¶10

CORAM:AMIT BORKAR, J.

¶11

DATED:JANUARY 23, 2024

¶12

P.C.:

¶13

1.The petitioner is challenging the order dated 16th September
1981 passed by Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in Tenancy
Revision Application No.112 of 1981. The petitioner in paragraph
No. 7 has explained the latches in filing the petition. The
explanation furnished is to the effect that the petitioner do not
receive legal advise regarding challenging the impugned order. It is
only after the petitioner contacted another advocate in 2021, he
arranged the papers and file the petition. The explanation
furnished in paragraph No.7 is not sufficient to condone delay and
laches in filing the present petition.

¶14

2.Hence, the writ petition cannot be entertain on the ground of
delay.

¶15

3. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed. No costs.

¶16

(AMIT BORKAR, J.)

¶17

Smt. Luismari Fasku Dsouza Thr. Poa Manvel Fasku Dsouza v. Abu Razak Shaikh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Luismari Fasku Dsouza Thr. Poa Manvel Fasku Dsouza v. Abu Razak Shaikh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikrant Vikas Raikar Vs M/S Vikrant Construction Co. and Anr.

Shri. Prakasht Ramchandra Borge Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Divisional Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies and Ors.

Shanti Tower Co. Op Hsg Soc Ltd. Vs Robert Fernandes and Ors.

Yamunabai Bajarang Padwal (Patil) and Anr. Vs Mukund Vishnu Kulkarni (Kapare) and Anr.

Mukund Vishnu Kulkarni (Kapare) Vs Yamunabai Bajrang Padval and Ors.

Shri Haridas Vitthal Shinde and Ors. Vs Shri. Sharadrao Bapuso Shinde and Ors.