Shabana Naushad Alias Navshad Mulani vs the State of Maharashtra Addl. Divisional Commissioner Pune Division and Ors.

17-WP-9451-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO. 9451 OF 2024

Shabana Naushad Alias Navshad Mulani ...Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra Addl. Divisional Commissioner Pune Division And Ors. ...Respondents

¶5

Mr. A. R. Shaikh, for the Petitioner.

¶6

Mr. V.R. Raje, A.G.P. for the Respondent – State.

¶7

CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J. DATE : 12^th JULY, 2024

¶8

P.C.:

¶9

The Application for stay filed by the petitioner is to the order of the Collector dated 25.01.2024, in an appeal filed under Section 16 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 which

¶10

has been rejected by the impugned order 26.03.2024. The only relief which is being claimed by the learned counsel for the petitioner upon instructions, is to direct the Appellate Authority to decide the appeal itself within stipulated period of time, considering which, there would be no necessity to issue notices to

¶11

Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALI LIYAKAT LIYAKAT JAMADAR JAMADAR Date:2024.07.12 18:27:45 +0530

1 of 2

Sajakali Jamadar

17-WP-9451-2024.doc

respondent Nos.2 and 3. Learned AGP appears for respondent No.1.

¶16

Considering the nature of the relief sought in this Petition, the petition is disposed off by directing the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Pune to decide the Appeal No.4/2024 pending before him within a period of four weeks from the date of presentation of this order before him.

¶17

(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)

¶18

2 of 2

¶19

Sajakali Jamadar

Shabana Naushad Alias Navshad Mulani v. the State of Maharashtra Addl. Divisional Commissioner Pune Division and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shabana Naushad Alias Navshad Mulani v. the State of Maharashtra Addl. Divisional Commissioner Pune Division and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rushi S/O Balwant Dadmal, Being Minor, Thr. Father, Mr. Balwant S/O Narayan Dadmal vs the Dy. Director/ Member Secretary the S.T.. Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur

Krishna Bandu Patil and Ors. vs Rajaram Dhondi Patil Dec Thr Its Legal Heirs and Ors.

Gurudev Siddha Peeth vs Maharashtra State Electricity Distibution Co. Ltd.

Ashok @ Ashokrao Anandrao Naikwade vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Ors.

Era Realtors Private Limited vs Chanchal Rastogi and Ors.

M/S. Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Thr. Its Director Atul N. Dhadiwal vs Union of India Thr. the General Manager Central Railway