Petitioner sought a direction to the Family Court to expedite the trial on a time-bound schedule. The court found no merit, held such prayer impermissible in view of Supreme Court precedent, dismissed the petition, and left the petitioner free to apply to the Family Court, Nashik.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
32-WP-9350-24.doc
MJ Jadhav
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9350 OF 2024
Utkarsh Goraknath Baile … Petitioner
vs.
Sandhya Utkarsh Baile and anr. … Respondents
Mr. Rahul Shelke a/w Akshay Bansode for the Petitioner.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATED : 11th JULY 2024
ORDER :-
decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of High Court
Bar Association, Allahabad v/s State of Uttar Pradesh and ors1 .
(GAURI GODSE, J.)
Digitally signed by MANGALTAI MANGALTAI JAYWANT JAYWANT JADHAV JADHAV Date: 2024.07.20 14:43:56 +0530
1 2024 SCC Online SC 207
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court trial can be directed to be expedited on a time-bound schedule.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v/s State of Uttar Pradesh and orsRelied on¶3
2024 SCC Online SC 207 · Who else cites this
Utkarsh Goraknath Baile
Sandhya Utkarsh Baile
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
