Disposed

M/S. Nikam and Nikam through Partner Sou. Revati C Patil v. Shashikant Narayan Dalvi and Ors.

Bombay HC4 Sept 2024WP/9269/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order corrects a technical error regarding the citation and description of mutation entries and plots in the reasoning paragraph of a minutes order dated 4th September 2024, directing registry staff to amend the specific lines.

What did the court decide?

Correction of a previous minutes order to include specific mutation and plot references.

M/S. Nikam and Nikam through Partner Sou. Revati C Patil… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-AS:37511

¶2

This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //

¶3

501-WP-9269-19.doc

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.9269 OF 2019. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9271 OF 2019. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9272 OF 2019. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2394 OF 2020.

¶6

M/S. Nikam And Nikam Through Partner Sou. Revati C Patil ...Petitioner.

¶7

Versus Shashikant Narayan Dalvi And Ors. ...Respondents.

¶8

WITH

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO.9273 OF 2019.

¶10

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.9270 OF 2019. WITH

¶11

WRIT PETITION NO.9274 OF 2019.

¶12

M/S. Nikam And Nikam Through Partner Sou. Revati C Patil

¶13

...Petitioner.

¶14

Versus

¶15

Dhanraj Shashikant Dalvi And Ors.

¶16

...Respondents.

¶17

Mr. Mandar Bagkar i/b. Mr. Chetan Patil for the Petitioners. Ms. Savita Prabhune. AGP for the Respondent-State.

¶18

Mr. Drupad Patil i/b Mr. Balasaheb G. Ligade for Respondent Nos.8 to 14 in WP No.9269/2019, 9271/2019, 9272/2019, 2394/2020 and for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 to 8 in WP No.9273/2019, 9274/2019 and 9270/2019.

——————

1 of 2

rsk

This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //

¶23

501-WP-9269-19.doc

¶24

Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.

¶25

Date : 26^th September, 2024.

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

1. Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board.

¶28

2. Praecipe has been moved for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 4^th September 2024.

¶29

3. In the 5^th line of paragraph No.11 at the end of 2^nd sentence add the words “ qua Mutation Entry No.46990”.

¶30

4. In the 7^th line of paragraph No.11 at the end of 2^nd sentence add the words “ qua the plots bearing No.1 to 8, A-1, A-3 and C-2 in Survey No.930/3.”

¶31

5. In the 8^th line of paragraph No.11 at the end of 3^rd sentence add the words “ qua the plots bearing No.1 to 8, A-1, A-3 and C-2 in Survey No.930/3.

¶32

6. Corrected order to be uploaded accordingly.

¶33

[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]

¶34

2 of 2

¶35

rsk

¶36

Signed by: Rajeshwari S. Karve Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 01/10/2024 11:17:25

M/S. Nikam and Nikam through Partner Sou. Revati C Patil v. Shashikant Narayan Dalvi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Nikam and Nikam through Partner Sou. Revati C Patil v. Shashikant Narayan Dalvi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

1. the State of Maharashtra, and Ors. Vs 1. Shivaji Vithoba Fopale and Ors.

1. the State of Maharashtra, and Ors. Vs 1. Shivaji Vithoba Fopale and Ors.

The State of Maharashtra, and Ors. Vs Shivaji Vithoba Fopale and Ors.

Sagar Subhash Patil vs Bajarang Chandram Kamble and Ors.

M/S. Mondelez India Foods Pvt. Ltd., vs the Deputy Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation

Mrs. Godwin Lewis vs Mr. Robert John Quadros and Anr.