Writ petition concerning an impugned order; with the State affidavit showing women voters fell below the required 50%, the matter no longer survived and counsel sought withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
35-wp-926-19.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Writ Petition (WP) No. 926 of 2019
Satyaphulabai W/o Mahadeorao Deshbhratar
Versus
State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai and Ors.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Shri S.P.Bodalkar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri S.B. Bissa, AGP for the respondent/State.
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J. DATED : 9th JANUARY, 2024.
In view of the categorical statement made in paragraph 9 of the affidavit of Deputy Superintendent, State Excise, Nagpur dated 19th December, 2019 stating that out of 831 women voters in Gram Panchayat Murti, 356 women voters have exercised right of vote which is less than required 50%, main petition fails against the petitioner and as such impugned order dated 24th January, 2019 looses its efficacy, the matter does not survive.
[ANIL S. KILOR, J.]
SKNair
Satyaphulabai W/o Mahadeorao Deshbhratar
State of Maharashtra
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
