Single Judge Writ Petition challenging action under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959 regarding election expenses. Court found no merit as petitioner admitted lack of supporting documents and dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-WP-9142-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9142 OF 2024
Shekhappa Mhalappa Kalkutage ...Petitioner Versus The Ld. District Collector Akkalkot Division And Ors ...Respondents
Adv. Shivraj Patil a/w Adv. Sagar Tambe, for the Petitioner. Mr. R. S. Pawar, A.G.P. for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J. DATE : 9th JULY 2024
P.C.:
TALLE
SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO
Digitally signed by TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Date: 2024.07.10 19:31:43 +0530
1 of 2
Shubham Talle
20-WP-9142-2024.doc
respondent no. 4 as Rs. 1450/-, the learned counsel for the petitioner admits that neither the statement of the account nor the vouchers have been produced. These are the only documents, which would indicate any discrepancy since no other documents are placed on record.
(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
2 of 2
Shubham Talle
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner raises any merit regarding the delegation of disqualification powers implicating election expense limits.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Shekhappa Mhalappa Kalkutage
The Ld. District Collector Akkalkot Division
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
