Petitioner sought writ relief challenging a transfer order while an Original Application against the same order was pending before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The Court declined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction.
Writ Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P. No.9099/2024
:: 1 ::
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.9099 OF 2024
Satish s/o Eknath Pawar … Petitioner
VERSUS
The District Collector & Another … Respondents
Shri V.B. Anjanwatikar, Advocate for Petitioner Mrs. V.N. Patil Jadhav, A.G.P. for respondents
CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & KISHORE C. SANT, J.
DATE: 26th AUGUST, 2024.
P.C. :
Court only alleging that the Tribunal has not considered prayer for interim relief and that the petitioner has not been relieved.
W.P. No.9099/2024
:: 2 ::
dismissed.
(KISHORE C. SANT, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
fmp/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ petition can be entertained while Original Application challenging transfer order is pending before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
Satish s/o Eknath Pawar
The District Collector & Another
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA
KISHORE C. SANT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
