Adjournment order in a writ petition kept pending due to related proceedings before the Supreme Court. Petitioner's counsel could not update the court, and respondent No.3's advocate was absent. Matter renotified.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 865 of 2023
Amrut
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.865 OF 2023
VINCENT FERNANDES THROUGH POA MELWIN FERNANDES ... PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF GOA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 5 ORS ... RESPONDENTS
... RESPONDENTS
Mr. Savio Mesquita, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr Pravin Faldessai, Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1, 4, 5 and 6.
CORAM:- BHARATI DANGRE & NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATED :- 9th June, 2025
P.C.:
Respondent No.3 was represented by Advocate Mr Kewal Sawant, but today he has failed to mark his appearance.
The learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to make a statement about the pending proceedings before the Apex Court.
Page 1 of 2
9th June, 2025
WP 865 of 2023
Let the learned counsel for the petitioner intimate Advocate Mr Sawant about the listing of the petition as we want to secure his presence to ascertain the progress of the petition before the Apex Court.
Renotify to 25.06.2025.
NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, J. BHARATI DANGRE, J.
Signed by: AMRUT NAGESH TARI Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 10/06/2025 10:14:44
Page 2 of 2 9th June, 2025
Vincent Fernandes through POA Melwin Fernandes
The State of Goa through its Chief Secretary
Respondent Nos. 2 to 6
Bharati Dangre
Nivedita P. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
