Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear. The petitioner had also not complied with an earlier direction to deposit Rs.46,00,000/-, and the respondent had filed an execution application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/2
28 - WP 8639 OF 2019.doc
Digitally signed by KANCHAN KANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2024.05.02 15:10:05 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8639 OF 2019
Prashant Narayanan ….. Petitioner
VERSUS
Murad Moosa Merchant ….. Respondent
None for the Petitioner.
Mr.Rohit Vaishya i/b. Mr.Yogendra M. Kanchan for the Respondent.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 29 APRIL, 2024
P.C. :-
None appears for the petitioner when the matter was called
out.
2. By an order dated 8 August, 2019, the petitioner was
directed to deposit a sum of Rs.46,00,000/- within two weeks from the date of the said order and it was made clear that in case, the petitioner does not deposit a sum of Rs.46,00,000/within two weeks, ad-interim order shall stand vacated without further reference to the Court and the respondent was granted
KVM
28 - WP 8639 OF 2019.doc
liberty to execute the order impugned in the petition.
dismissed for want of prosecution.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
Prashant Narayanan
Murad Moosa Merchant
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
