Dismissed

Kavin Parshotam Tulsiani Thr Poa Prashotam Tulsiani v. Maharashtra Real Estae Regulation Authority Thr the Chairman and Ors.

Bombay HC23 Feb 2024WP/8501/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed withdrawal of two writ petitions filed against the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulation Authority with liberty to appeal, simultaneously disposing of interlinked interim applications as infructuous without examining merits.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw petitions with liberty to appeal; writ petitions disposed of with liberty to adopt alternate remedy; interim applications disposed of as infructuous.

Kavin Parshotam Tulsiani Thr Poa Prashotam Tulsiani… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

 15-WP-8501-2023.docx

¶2

rrpillai

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 8501 OF 2023

¶5

Kavin Parshotam Tulsiani through … Petitioner Power of Attorney Parshotam Tulsiani Vs. Maharashtra Real Estate Regulation … Respondents Authority through the Chairman and Others

¶6

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 15557 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8501 OF 2023

¶7

Marvel Omega Builders Pvt. Ltd … Applicant through Managing Director Vs. Mr. Kavin Parshotam Tulsiani … Respondent

¶8

WITH

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO. 8488 OF 2023

¶10

Magnum Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner through Director Vs. Maharashtra Real Estate … Respondents Regulation Authority through The Chairman and Others

¶11

Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2024.02.26 14:26:39 +0530

¶12

1/3

¶13

RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI

¶14

 15-WP-8501-2023.docx

¶15

WITH

¶16

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13341 OF 2023 IN

¶17

WRIT PETITION NO. 8488 OF 2023

¶18

Marvel Omega Builders Pvt. Ltd … Applicant through Managing Director

¶19

Vs.

¶20

Magnum Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. … Respondent through Director Mr. Parshotam Tulsiani

¶21

Mr. Abhishek T. Ingale i/b. Mr. Tejpal Ingale for the Petitioner.

¶22

Mr. Amit Ashok Gharte for the Respondent.

¶23

CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 23^rd FEBRUARY 2024

¶24

P.C.

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioners on instructions seeks leave to

¶26

withdraw the petitions with liberty to adopt appropriate remedy of filing

¶27

appeal. Leave granted with liberty as prayed.

¶28

Writ Petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to adopt alternate remedy as permissible in law.

¶29

It is clarified that I have not examined the rival contentions of the

¶30

parties on merits. Hence, all contentions of all parties are kept open.

¶31

2/3

¶32

15-WP-8501-2023.docx

¶33

In view of the disposal of the Writ Petitions, both Interim

¶34

Applications are rendered infructuous and hence disposed of as infructuous.

¶35

[GAURI GODSE, J.]

¶36

3/3

Kavin Parshotam Tulsiani Thr Poa Prashotam Tulsiani v. Maharashtra Real Estae Regulation Authority Thr the Chairman and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kavin Parshotam Tulsiani Thr Poa Prashotam Tulsiani v. Maharashtra Real Estae Regulation Authority Thr the Chairman and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The President, Bharat Shikshan Mandal, Satara and Anr. Vs Shri. Hanmant Dattatray Nalawade and Anr.

Kamalakant Shivram Malandkar (Since Deceased) vs Rekha Krishna Acharekar

Kamalakant Shiivram Malandkar(Since Deceased vs Rekha Krishna Achrekar

Dilip Vitthal Varkute Vs Mr. Hiralal Sonawane and Ors.

Taher Razzak Sayyad and Anr. Vs Prabhat Tara Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd.

Rupee Co-Operative Bank Ltd. and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Divisional Joint Registrar of Co-Op. Societies and Ors.