Writ petition withdrawn by petitioner due to lapse of time making the matter infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:4046
1 wp 8500.19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Writ Petition No.8500/2019
(Pankaj V State of Maharashtra and others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. S.S. Ghate, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. Lonare, AGP for resp. no.1. Mr. Kasat, Advocate for resp. no.2.
CORAM : Abhay J. Mantri, J. DATE : 04-04-2024.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that due
to a lapse of time, the matter has become infructuous. Therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw the same.
( Abhay J. Mantri, J. )
Deshmukh
Pankaj
State of Maharashtra and others
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court