No proposition of general application; the writ petition was permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
201 Wp-8483-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8483 OF 2024
Shree Chinchwad Deosthan Trust. Versus
State Of Maharashtra and Others.
...Petitioner.
...Respondents.
Ms. Padma Chinta, Ms. Swati Sawant i/b Harshad Bhadbhade for the Petitioner.
Ms. Savita prabhune, AGP for the Respondent-State.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : June 20, 2024.
P. C. :
1. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, on instructions,
seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
1 of 1
Patil-SR
Signed by: Sachin R. Patil Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 20/06/2024 18:53:57
Shree Chinchwad Deosthan Trust
State Of Maharashtra
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
