Writ petition dismissed as infructuous after joint submission by both parties' advocates that the matter had become infructuous and the petitioners did not wish to proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 4-WP No.8450.2019.odt
2024:BHC-NAG:4020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 8450 OF 2019
Shree Builders and Developers through its Partner Shri Rupesh Sudhakar Karemore and another
..VS..
Shri Narendra S/o Dharnidharji Gandhi
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. Fidvi Ibrahim Abid, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. R.R. Shrivastava, Advocate for respondent.
CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. DATED : APRIL 05, 2024
Learned Advocate for the parties jointly submitted that the matter has become infructuous, therefore, the petitioners do not want to proceed with the matter.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)
Kirtak
Shree Builders and Developers through its Partner Shri Rupesh Sudhakar Karemore and another
Shri Narendra S/o Dharnidharji Gandhi
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
