Writ petition challenging the upholding of a no confidence motion against the petitioner as Sarpanch. The Court found that the petitioner was given an opportunity to defend herself and the motion was supported by majority votes. The petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2024:BHC-NAG:1563
32.wp.8228.23.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.8228 OF 2023
Sau. Lata Vitthal Lande .Vs. The Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Shri Ram Karode, Advocate for petitioner. Shri B.M. Lonare, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 3/State. Shri Rahul Tajne, Advocate for respondent No.4. Shri N.B. Kalwaghe, Advocate for respondent Nos.5 to 11.
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J. DATED : 07/02/2024
C.L. Dhakate
2 32.wp.8228.23.odt
JUDGE
C.L. Dhakate
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the no confidence motion against the petitioner as Sarpanch was passed without discussion or opportunity to defend?
Sau. Lata Vitthal Lande
The Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati
others
ANIL S. KILOR, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
