Writ petition before the Nagpur Bench withdrawn by the petitioner on instructions; the court permitted withdrawal and disposed of the petition without deciding any substantive matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:11305-DB
931.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 8032 OF 2018 VANITA D/O GANPATRAO DEOLIKAR @ VANITA W/O DAMODAR MOUNDEKAR
VERSUS
MAHARASHTRA RAJYA SAHAKARI DUDH MAHASANGH MARYADIT, THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MUMBAI AND 1
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Mr. M.V. Bute, Advocate for the Petitioner/s
Mr. D.M. Kakani, Advocate for the respondent No.1
Mr. Dhumale, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 09.10.2024
[ABHAY J. MANTRI, J]
[BHARATI DANGRE, J]
ND.THAWRE PA
Vanita d/o Ganpatrao Deolikar @ Vanita w/o Damodar Moundekar
Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Dudh Mahasangh Maryadit, through its Managing Director, Mumbai
Bharati Dangre
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
