Disposed

Bapurao Madhavrao Ugile v. the State of Maharashtra through Irrigation Development Department and Others

Bombay HC22 Jan 2024WP/783/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition concerning land acquisition compensation, the High Court directed the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Latur, to consider the petitioner's request for rightful delivery of compensation within 60 days and granted stakeholders an opportunity of hearing before disposing of the matter.

What did the court decide?

IEO to Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Latur, to consider petitioner's request and act within 60 days.

Bapurao Madhavrao Ugile Vs the State of Maharashtra through… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-AUG:1570-DB

¶2

1 44wp783o24

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

44 WRIT PETITION NO. 783 OF 2024

¶5

BAPURAO MADHAVRAO UGILE

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS

¶8

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Biradar Ramrao D. AGP for Respondents 1 to 4/State : Mr. S.B. Narwade Advocate for Respondent 5 : Mr. U.B. Bondar

¶9

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

¶10

DATE :- 22^nd January, 2024

¶11

Per Court :-

¶12

The Petitioner has put forth prayer clause A, which

¶13

reads as under:-

¶14

“A) The Petitioner is praying direction to respondent authority to initiate the acquisition proceeding in respect of petitioner’s land situated in survey No.20 admeasuring 2 H at Sayyedpur, Tq.Deoni (Bk), Dist. Latur by joint measurement and pay the compensation as per today’s market value from the date of possession taken by the State Government.”

¶15

The contention of the Petitioner is that a wrong

¶16

person has taken the amount of compensation. The Petitioner was

¶17

2 44wp783o24

¶18

before this Court in Writ Petition No.3140/2006, which was decided by the judgment dated 17.04.2007 and the joint measurement was directed. The Petitioner was again before this Court in Writ Petition No.4410/2014, which was decided by the order dated 08.01.2019 and the Petitioner was directed to approach the Civil Court. Having approached the Civil Court in RCS No.5/2019, the Petitioner has the judgment and decree in his favour and his right, title and interest has been upheld. He submits that the person, who has wrongly received the amount of compensation, has already returned the amount to the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Latur.

¶19

Leave to add the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Latur. Addition be carried out forthwith.

¶20

Since Shri Bondar, the learned Advocate, is on the panel of the Zilla Parishad, we requested him to assist the Court. 5. The Petitioner now prays that the compensation amount be rightfully delivered to him. His representations dated 25.04.2023, 30.11.2023 and 04.12.2023 are pending before the Chief Executive Officer.

¶21

In view of the above, we request the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Latur, to consider the request

¶22

3 44wp783o24

¶23

of the Petitioner in the light of the judgment and decree in his favour and draw an appropriate conclusion within a period of 60 days from today. All stakeholders be granted an opportunity of hearing.

¶24

With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed off .

¶25

kps (Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )

Bapurao Madhavrao Ugile v. the State of Maharashtra through Irrigation Development Department and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bapurao Madhavrao Ugile v. the State of Maharashtra through Irrigation Development Department and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxman Dnyaneshwar Aware Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Vijay Sobhagchand Pagariya Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Others

Prakash Kamlakar Pathak Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Principal Secretary and Others

Rameshwar Majur Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit through the Chairman Laxmikant Narayan Hange vs the State of Maharashtra through the Principal Secretary and Others

Kanifnath Majur Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit through Its Secretary Sudam Gahininath Sanap vs the State of Maharashtra through the Principal Secretary and Others

Arvind Deoram Atram vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Others