Writ petition concerning processing of pension papers; after respondent furnished documents and the management agreed to process the pension papers, the court disposed of the petition as nothing survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) 45wp779.09
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.779/2009
Late Dadasaheb Mandle Bahu Uddeshiya Vikas Va Shikshan Prasar Mandal .Vs. Ku. Nanda Babarao Hirulkar and Ors.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. A. S. Dhore, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S. P. Kshirsagar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms S. N. Thakur, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 25, 2024
Respondent No.2 has furnished documents to the counsel for the petitioner in terms of order dated 10.09.2024.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that he will furnish documents to the management who will immediately forward pension papers for further action.
Since, the management has taken a stand to process pension papers, nothing survives in the petition. The petition is accordingly disposed of.
(Anil L. Pansare, J.)
Kahale
Late Dadasaheb Mandle Bahu Uddeshiya Vikas Va Shikshan Prasar Mandal
Ku. Nanda Babarao Hirulkar
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Anil L. Pansare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
