The petitioner challenged a decree of eviction. The court noted that the petitioner failed to appear on multiple dates. The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/1
5 - WP 7768 OF 2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
KANCHAN Digitally signed byKANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2024.02.0312:54:29 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 7768 OF 2017
Tebunnisa Nasir Shaikh….. Petitioner
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.
.….. Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr.Rajan Pawar, A.G.P. for the State.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 1 FEBRUARY, 2024
P.C. :-
This petition is filed by the original defendant who suffers a
decree of eviction passed by the Competent Authority and by the
Additional Commissioner, Konkan Division, Mumbai.
2. None appeared for the petitioner on 5 September, 2019 and
on 25 January, 2024. Even today when the matter is called out,
nobody appears for the petitioner.
3. Writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
Tebunnisa Nasir Shaikh
The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court