The petitioners sought and were granted permission to withdraw a writ petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to adopt other permissible remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-wp772-2024.doc
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.772 OF 2024
Digitally signed byATUL ATULGANESH GANESHKULKARNI KULKARNI Date: 2024.01.18 14:11:19 +0530
Usha Ramesh Surti & Anr.… Petitioners
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.… Respondents
Mr. Anand Giri with Mr. Sagar Bataria for the
petitioners.
Mr. Y.D. Patil, AGP for respondent No.1/State.
Mr. Anoop Patil for respondent No.2/AGRC.
Mr. Abhijit Patil i/by Mr. J.G. Aradwad (Reddy) for
respondent No.4.
CORAM:AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED:JANUARY 18, 2024
P.C.:
1. Learned advocate for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.
3. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to adopt appropriate remedy as are permissible in law.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Usha Ramesh Surti
Usha Ramesh Surti & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
AGRC
Respondent No. 4
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court