The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a promotion order after recording a settlement agreement between the petitioner and management, clarifying the agreement binds private parties but not the Education Authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 33-WP-7370-2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7370 OF 2021
YUGANDHARA SHARAD PATIL
Digitally signed by YUGANDHARA SHARAD PATIL Date: 2024.02.12 10:54:03 +0530
Smt. Usha Namdeo More ...Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Ors ...Respondents
Ms. Shraddha Pawar a/w Prachi Tadake i/b Vilas S. Panpatte for the Petitioner.
Ms. S.S. Bhende, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Ojas Gauri i/b Sujay Gangal for Respondent No. 5.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.M.SATHAYE, JJ.
DATE : 6 FEBRUARY 2024
P.C.:
. Petitioner had filed this Writ Petition challenging order passed by Respondent No. 2- Deputy Director of Education granting promotion to Respondent No. 5 on 100% grant-in-aid basis.
Y.S.Patil
2 33-WP-7370-2021.doc
disputes, as stated in the Consent Terms which are signed by the parties. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked as “X” for identification and letters are marked as X-1 and X-2 for identification.
(M.M.SATHAYE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Y.S.Patil
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging promotion order should be disposed of upon settlement between parties.
Whether the settlement agreement is binding on the Education Authorities.
Yugandhara Sharad Patil
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
M.M. Sathaye
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
