Allowed

Amit Shamgir Gosavi and Others v. State of Mah. Thr. Vasant Nagar Ps, and Another.

Bombay HC10 Oct 2024WP/695/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal writ petition sought to quash criminal proceedings under Section 498-A IPC arising from a domestic dispute. Since the parties, who are now divorced, settled the matter amicably with a compensation payment, the High Court allowed the application and quashed the criminal case.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Case No.133/2023 arising out of Crime No.342/2022 for offence under Section 498-A IPC is quashed and set aside.

Amit Shamgir Gosavi and Others Vs State of Mah. Thr… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

2024:BHC-NAG:11389-DB

¶3

Judgment

¶4

apl695.23

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY : NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

¶6

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 695 OF 2023.

¶7

1.Amit Shamgir Gosavi, Age 31 years, Occupation – Nil,

¶8

2.Shamgir Kisangir Gosavi, Age 60 years, Occupation – Retired,

¶9

3.Sunita Shamgir Gosavi, Age 55 years, Occupation – Household,

¶10

4.Ashish Shamgir Gosavi, Age 34 years, Occupation – Business,

¶11

All residents of 53, Basavraj Nilay Ngar, Rubi Nagar, Jule Solapur District Solapur.

¶12

5.Prabhu Kacharu Giri, Age 55 years, Occupation – Business, resident of 135, Prop.Kavita Saree Centre Behind Kamgar Kalyan Bhavan, Mothadevi Mandir, Bajaj Nagar, Aurangabad.

... APPLICANTS.

VERSUS

Rgd.

Judgment

apl695.23

1.The State of Maharashtra, through Vasant Nagar Police Station, Pusad, District Yavatmal. Vide C.R.No.342/2022.

¶20

2.Pallavi Amit Gosavi, [wife of applicant no.1] Age 25 years, Occupation – Housewife, resident of c/o. Manoj Manohar Giri, reident of at Post Bhojala, Tahsil Pusad.

¶21

.. NON-APPLICANTS.

¶22

Mr. C.S. Tamhane, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. N. Joshi, A.P.P. for Non-applicant No.1. Ms P.R. Arbat Awathale, Advocate for Non-applicant No.2.

¶23

CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 10, 2024.

¶24

ORAL JUDGMENT (PER VINAY JOSHI, J.) :

¶25

Heard. Admit. By consent of the learned Counsel for the

¶26

parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal.

¶27

This is an application seeking to quash the Criminal

Rgd.

Judgment

apl695.23

prosecution bearing Regular Criminal Case No.133/2023 arising out of first information report bearing Crime No.342/2022 registered with Vasant Nagar Police Station, Yavatmal for the offence punishable under Section 498-A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code on account of settlement.

¶33

The informant / lady feeling matrimonial harassment has lodged the aforesaid report. In the meantime, the matter has been amicably settled. The parties have already obtained divorce. The applicant has paid an amount of Rs.3.5 lakhs towards full and final settlement. The informant has filed reply-affidavit stating about the settlement and her no objection to quash the proceedings. She is present before the Court and is identified by her Advocate.

¶34

The offence is of matrimonial nature, which is now settled.

¶35

In view of above continuation of the prosecution would amount to abuse of the process of Court, hence, we proceed to pass the following order.

Rgd.

apl695.23

Judgment

Criminal Application is allowed and disposed of.

¶41

The Regular Criminal Case No.133/2023 arising out of first information report bearing Crime No.342/2022 registered with Vasant Nagar Police Station, Yavatmal for the offence punishable under Section 498-A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code on account of settlement., is hereby quashed and set aside.

¶42

Fees of the appointed Counsel for non-applicant no.2 be

¶43

determined as per Rules.

¶44

JUDGE J UDGE

¶45

Rgd.

Amit Shamgir Gosavi and Others v. State of Mah. Thr. Vasant Nagar Ps, and Another.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Shamgir Gosavi and Others v. State of Mah. Thr. Vasant Nagar Ps, and Another.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sheikh Gaffar @ Abdul Gaffar S/O Sheikh and Another Vs State of Mha. Thr. Pso A.T.S. Mumbai

The Deputy Chief Engineer, Central Railway Division, Ajani, Nagpur Vs Shri.Jagdamba Devi and Shri Shankarji Devasthan,Yavatmal Thr. Kulbhushan Gokulprasad Tiwari and Ors.

Nanda Wamanrao Thosar and 6 Others Vs State of Mha. Thr. Pso Ps Akot Dist.Akola and Another

Narayan Ramrao Ingle Vs State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Chikhli Dist.Buldhana and Anohthr

Sahebrao @ Nitin Wishram @ Isram Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary Home Dep. (Special) Mantralaya Mumbai and Another

Icici Home Finance Co.Ltd. Thr. Its Authorised Officer Umesh Gadkari Vs the Superintendent of Police Amravati (Rural) and Others