Petitioner challenged proceedings after investigation; the State filed an affidavit showing a charge-sheet had been filed and an intimation notice served. The court found the petitioner's denial of the receipt signature to be a sham plea and disposed of the petition, reserving his alternate remedy before the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm 55-wp687.2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 687 OF 2017
Sandeep Sudhir Jadhav …..Petitioner
Vs.
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents
Mr. Ganesh Bhujbal for the Petitioner. Mrs. A.A. Takalkar APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. B.R. Zarekar, API, Chaturshringi Police Station, Pune
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ. DATE : 16th FEBRUARY, 2024.
P.C.:-
1/2
ssm 55-wp687.2017.doc
said Affidavit a photocopy of intimation ( lqpuki= ) dated 23rd May, 2017 is annexed. On the said intimation, the Petitioner has effected his signature for its receipt.
Mr. Bhujbal learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner on instructions submitted that, the Petitioner is disputing the said signature as it is not effected by him.
having alternate remedy under the provisions of Cr.P.C., before the trial Court.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
Digitally signed by SANJIV SANJIV SHARNAPPA SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR MASHALKAR Date: 2024.02.27 18:04:20 +0530
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition could be maintained after the police filed a charge-sheet following investigation.
Whether the petitioner's denial of the signature on the intimation notice could be accepted.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sandeep Sudhir Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
Shyam C. Chandak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
