Writ petition challenging an order condoning more than 20 years' delay, contending it was allowed without recording observations or sufficient reasons. Court issued notice to respondents returnable on 13.01.2025; State counsel waived service for respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp6786.24.O.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.6786 OF 2024
(Daulat Natthuji Tupat and others Vs. Talathi, Mouze Wadgaon Rajdi, Dhamangaon Railway, Amravati and others)
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar’s Orders.
Court's or Judge's orders.
Mr. J. J. Chandurkar, Advocate for Petitioners.
CORAM: ANIL S. KILOR, J. DATE: 2 nd DECEMBER, 2024.
The delay of more than 20 years came to be condoned which is under challenge. It is submitted that without recording observations and without recording sufficient reasons delay came to be allowed.
JUDGE
NSN
Signed by: Mr. N.S. Nikhare Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 02/12/2024 17:09:58
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condonation of a delay of more than 20 years, allegedly without recording sufficient reasons, is sustainable?
Daulat Natthuji Tupat and others
Talathi, Mouze Wadgaon Rajdi, Dhamangaon Railway, Amravati
State
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
