Petitioner claims the National Highways Authority encroached on his land used for highway construction and that a pending acquisition proposal was not concluded. Court issued notice to respondents, returnable on a future date; State counsel waived service for two respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 924.wp.6721.24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 6721/2024 Sanjay S/o. Keshrimalji Baheti Vs.
Project Director, National Highways Authority and Ors.
Mr. S.A. Mohta, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. S. M. Ghodeswar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.2 & 3/State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 22/11/2024.
. Heard Mr. S. A. Mohata, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. M. Ghodeswar, learned A.G.P. for the respondents.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Signed by: Mrs. R.M. MANDADE RGurnule Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 26/11/2024 14:43:49
Sanjay S/o Keshrimalji Baheti
Project Director, National Highways Authority
Respondent No. 2 (State)
Respondent No. 3 (State)
Nitin W. Sambre
Vrushali V. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
