The High Court disposed of a writ petition and connected civil applications, holding that no issues survived in the petition following a specific order passed by the Supreme Court in a related civil appeal.
The writ petition and all connected civil applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:20776
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1 WRIT PETITION NO. 6698 OF 2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7561 OF 2024 IN WP/6698/2024
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7560 OF 2024 IN WP/6698/2024
MS RARE ASSET RECONSTRUCTION LIMITED THROUGH TIS AUTHORIZED OFFICER MS SHAHIN JAMALI
….Petitioner
VERSUS
DINKAR KALYAN GAPAT
…..Respondent
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Salgar Suresh Prabhakar Advocate for Respondent : Mr. G.K. Naik-Thigle
Advocate for applicants in CA : Mr. D.S. Bhapkar h/f. Mr. V.D. Salunke
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : September 04, 2024
PER COURT :-
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )
ssc/
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Civil Appeal No. 9812/2024 dated 27.8.2024Followed¶1
MS RARE ASSET RECONSTRUCTION LIMITED
DINKAR KALYAN GAPAT
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
