Disposed

Amravati District Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Thr. Chief Executive Officer, Amravati v. Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Amravati Division, Amravati and Ors.

Bombay HC12 Nov 2024WP/6665/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bank challenged a Divisional Joint Registrar's order directing production of documents in a Section 13 proceeding. The High Court modified it: photocopies to be filed and supplied to respondents, originals kept available for verification and perusal at hearings.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order modified; bank to file photocopies, supply them to contesting respondents, allow inspection of originals, and keep originals ready for perusal.

Amravati District Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Thr… — Cooperative Societies | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:12428

¶2

1 905-wp-6665-24.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

Writ Petition (WP) No. 6665 of 2024

¶5

Amravati District Central Co-operative Bank Limited, through Chief Executive Officer, Amravati

¶6

Versus

¶7

Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Amravati Division, Amravati and others

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order

¶9

Shri P.A.Kadu, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. M.A.Barabde, AGP for the respondent/State. Shri H.D.Dangre, Advocate a/w Shri R.B.Dhore, Advocate for the respondent nos. 2 to 8, 10, 11, 12 and 14.

¶10

CORAM : N.R.BORKAR, J. DATED : 12^th NOVEMBER, 2024.

¶11

This petition takes exception to the order

¶12

dated 30^th October, 2024 passed by the respondent No.1

¶13

the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Amravati Division, Amravati in the proceeding filed by

¶14

the petitioner in terms of Section 13 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

¶15

SKNair

¶16

2 905-wp-6665-24.odt

¶17

By the order impugned, the respondent no.1

¶18

has directed the petitioner-Bank to produce certain documents on the record of said proceedings.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to produce photo-copies of the said documents on record as the petitioner needs those documents for day-to-day administration.

¶20

On the other hand, the learned counsel for the contesting respondents submits that the original documents would be necessary to decide the proceedings.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the following order is passed.

¶22

i. On the next date of hearing before the respondent No.1, the petitioner shall submit the photocopies of the documents mentioned in the impugned order on the record of the proceedings in question.

¶23

ii. The petitioner shall supply the photo-copies of the said documents to contesting respondents and

¶24

SKNair

¶25

3 905-wp-6665-24.odt

¶26

shall allow the contesting respondents to verify / inspect the original documents.

¶27

iii. The petitioner shall keep the original documents ready for perusal of the all concerned on every date of hearing of the proceedings in question.

¶28

The impugned order shall stand modified to

¶29

the above extent. The writ petition is disposed.

¶30

[N.R.BORKAR, J.]

¶31

SKNair

Amravati District Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Thr. Chief Executive Officer, Amravati v. Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Amravati Division, Amravati and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amravati District Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Thr. Chief Executive Officer, Amravati v. Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Amravati Division, Amravati and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S R.C. Plasto Tanks and Pipes Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur Thr. Aut. Signatory Mukesh S. Gaidhane and Anr. Vs Bharat S/O Vishwanath Bhalerao

M/S R.C. Plasto Tanks and Pipes Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur Thr. Aut. Signatory, Mukesh S. Gaidhane and Anr. Vs Mangesh S/O Sheshrao Gourkhede

M/S R.C. Plasto Tanks and Pipes Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur Thr. Aut. Signatory, Mukesh S. Gaidhane and Anr. Vs Sunil S/O Gulabrao Kajale

Haresh Ratilal Tilak vs the State of Maharashtra

Kamlakar Ambo Mhatre vs State of Maharashtra

Babita Lalman Yadhav vs State of Maharashtra