Court disposed of a custody petition noting that an interim custody order had expired during pendency. Heard no merits; invited respondent to file fresh application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:12739
1
961-wp-6556-24(j).odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Writ Petition (WP) No. 6556 of 2024
Hemraj S/o Sukkal Gajbhiye and another Versus
Statish S/o Devidas Belekar
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Shri R.R.Prajapti, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri S.J.Chavhan, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM : N.R.BORKAR, J. DATED : 12th NOVEMBER, 2024.
This petition takes exception to the order dated 25th October, 2024 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, below Exhibit 45 in M.J.C. No. 92 of 2023.
SKNair
2 961-wp-6556-24(j).odt
terms.
SKNair
Hemraj S/o Sukkal Gajbhiye and another
Statish S/o Devidas Belekar
N.R.BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
