Petitioner sought to withdraw its writ petition against CIDCO and another respondent. The High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, without deciding any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6.6475.23-wp.docx
Digitally signed by BASAVRAJ BASAVRAJ GURAPPA GURAPPA PATIL PATIL Date: 2024.01.16 14:29:03 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6475 OF 2023
TPV Ventures LLP ….. Petitioner
Vs.
City Industrial and Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited & Anr ….. Respondents
Mr. Sanjay Udeshi with Mr. Samarth Jaidev I/b. Sanjay udeshi & Co. for the Petitioner
Mr. G. S. Hegde, Senior Advocate I/b. Ms. P. M. Bhansali for Respondent No.1.
Mr. Datta Mane a/w. Mr. Shreyas Chaudhari for Respondent No.2
CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : JANUARY 15, 2024
P.C.
instructions, seeks to withdraw the Writ Petition.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
1/1
Basavraj
TPV Ventures LLP
City Industrial and Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited
Anr
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
