The High Court of Bombay dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as petitioners had expired and no instructions were received from their legal representatives. Connected civil applications were disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
210-wp-6432-1995-ca-2949-1999-+++.doc
varsha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6432 OF 1995
Yashwant Krishnaji Gokhale and Anr
… Petitioners
vs.
Govind Babu Kundekar and Anr … Respondents
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2949 OF 1999
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 6432 OF 1995
Govind Babu Kundekar … Applicant
vs.
Yashwant Krishnaji Gokhale and Anr … Respondents
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 12224 OF 1999
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 6432 OF 1995
Govind Babu Kundekar … Applicant
vs.
Yashwant Krishnaji Gokhale and Anr … Respondents Mr. Nitin Muley for the Petitioners. Mr. A.G. Kundekar for Respondents.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATED : 25th JANUARY, 2024
P.C. :-
Page no. 1 of 2
210-wp-6432-1995-ca-2949-1999-+++.doc
no.1 and petitioner no.2 have expired.
(GAURI GODSE, J.)
Page no. 2 of 2
Yashwant Krishnaji Gokhale and Anr
Govind Babu Kundekar and Anr
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
