Writ petition against UCO Bank concerning compliance with a trial court order; petitioner sought leave to defend the suit and agreed to comply with the trial court order, then withdrew the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:12457
1 23wp6335.2019..odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.6335 OF 2019
(Prakash s/o Kisan Wankhede Vs. UCO Bank and others.)
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of direction, Court's or Judge's order and the Registrar's orders.
Mr. N.S. Warulkar, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. M.V. Acharya, Advocate for respondent No.1
CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. DATE : 13.11.2024.
When this court is not inclined with the submissions of
the learned Advocate for the petitioner, consequently, on instructions, Mr. Warulkar, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, propounded that the petitioner is ready to comply with the order of the trial court within one month from today, subject to granting leave to defend the suit, to which the learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1 Bank has not objected/has consented.
In view of the above, on instructions, Mr. Warulkar, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner does not want to proceed with the matter. Hence, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Belkhede
2 23wp6335.2019..odt
Inform the learned Trial Court of the order
immediately.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)
Belkhede
Prakash s/o Kisan Wankhede
UCO Bank
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
