Samarth Vimal Jagnani and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners challenged police summons dated 21 November 2024 requiring them to give voice samples, contending compulsion was contrary to constitutional mandate. The court adjourned the matter to 15 January 2025 and directed that the summons shall not be acted upon till then.
What did the court decide?
Police summons for voice samples not to be acted upon until 15 January 2025.
What the court decided
902-WP-6168-2024.doc
Digitally signed by RUPALI RUPALI RAJESHWAKODIKAR RAJESHWAKODIKAR Date:2024.12.20 15:55:40 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 6168 OF 2024
Samarth Vimal Jagnani & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Mr. Anish Sharma a/w Ms. Pulkeshi Gaikwad i/b Dinesh D. Tiwari Associates for the Petitioners.
Mr. V.N.Sagare, A.P.P for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
M.M.SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 20th DECEMBER 2024
P.C. :
- By this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing and setting
aside of the summons dated 21st November, 2024 issued by the
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Samarth Vimal Jagnani & Ors.
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
REVATI MOHITE DERE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Neela Kedar Gokhale Revati Mohite Dere
- Order 2 · Neela Kedar Gokhale Revati Mohite Dere
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
All Services Global Private Limited vs Union of India through Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas
Lokmangal Agro Indusries Ltd. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Principal Secretary State Excise and Anr.
Mosam Krushi Khajgi Market Pvt. Ltd. Thr Director , Kalpana Kunal Mutha vs Director of Agricultural Marketing Maharashtra State Pune and Ors.
Mr. Aniket Tupe vs Mrs. Piyusha Tupe