Disposed

Nanik Rupani and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra Thr the Government Pleader High Court (a.S.) and Ors.

Bombay HC30 Jan 2024WP/608/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition sought a direction to municipal authorities to decide an application to transfer a tax assessment bill in respect of premises at Altamount Road, Mumbai to Petitioner No.2. Respondents stated on instructions that the application would be decided within five weeks; the Court directed accordingly and kept the matter for compliance reporting.

What the court decided

AI extract

Nanik Rupani and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

25 wp 608--24.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 608 OF 2024

¶4

LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE

¶5

Digitally signed by LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE Date: 2024.02.01 12:28:41 +0530

¶6

Nanik Rupani & Anr.

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

¶9

.. Petitioners

¶10

.. Respondents

¶11

Mr.Ghanshyam Upadhyay (through v.c.) i/b. Law Juris for the Petitioner.

¶12

Mr. A I. Patel, Addl. GP a/w M. S. Bane, AGP for Respondent No.1.

¶13

Mr. R. Y. Sirsikar for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

¶14

Mr. Dilip Aehrekar , Assistant Assessor & Collector is present.

¶15

CORAM : B. P. COLABAWALLA & SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 30, 2024

¶16

P. C.

¶17

The above Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to Respondent

¶18

Nos. 2 and 3 to forthwith act upon the Application/Representation dated 7^th November, 2022 filed by Petitioner No.2 to transfer tax assessment bill in the name of Petitioner No.2 concerning the upper ground floor, Eastman House, Altamount Road, Mumbai-400026.

¶19

Laxmi

¶20

Page 1 of 2 JANUARY 30 2024

¶21

25 wp 608--24.doc

¶22

The learned Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 has, on instructions, stated that the Application/Representation dated 7^th November, 2022 filed by Petitioner No.2 [at Exhibit-A to the Petition] shall be decided by them within a period of five weeks from today.

¶23

Once this is the statement made, nothing survives in the above Writ Petition and it is directed that Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 shall decide the Application/Representation filed by Petitioner No.2 [dated 7^th November, 2022] within a period of five weeks from today.

¶24

Though we have disposed of the above Writ Petition, we place the same on board for reporting compliance on 6^th March, 2024.

¶25

This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/ Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order.

¶26

[ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.] [ B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]

¶27

Page 2 of 2 JANUARY 30 2024

¶28

Laxmi

Nanik Rupani and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra Thr the Government Pleader High Court (a.S.) and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Nanik Rupani and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra Thr the Government Pleader High Court (a.S.) and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sony Mony Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs Asset Care and Reconstrcution Enterprises and Anr.

Sandeep Mahendra Shah Vs Bank of Baroda and Ors.

Rajiv Kabir Hiranandani vs Namrata Zakaria

Supreme Infrastructure India Ltd. vs State Bank of India

Tajbanu Abdul Khalique Chauhan Vs State of Maharashtra Throu. the Tehsildar and the Executive Magistgrate and Ors.

Abdul Khalique Chauhan Vs State of Maharashtra Throu. Tehsidar and Executive Magistrate Vasai and Ors.