Disposed

Nagpur Vibhagiye Adharbhut Dhan Kharedi Federation, Thr. President, Namdeo Pandurang Kapgate v. State of Maha.,Thr Chief Secretary, Food, Civil Supplies and Cons. Protection Dept., Mumbai and Anr.

Bombay HC27 Mar 2024WP/6061/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of writ petition without examining merits on evidence. Petition challenged denial of benefits under a 2022 Government Resolution. Court directed respondents to decide pending representations within two months.

What did the court decide?

Respondents to decide the representation dated 10/05/2023 within two months. Respondent No.1 to decide the petition as a representation within two months.

Nagpur Vibhagiye Adharbhut Dhan Kharedi Federation… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 31 wp 6061-2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 6061 OF 2023

¶4

(Nagpur Vibhagiye Adharbhut Dhan Kharedi Federation, through its President Vs. State of Maharashtra, through its Chief Secretary, Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and another)

¶5

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

- - - - Shri V.R. Borkar, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri A.M. Kadukar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1 /State. Shri K.P. Mahalle, Advocate for Respondent No.2

¶7

CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, AND SMT.M.S.JAWALKAR JJ.

¶8

DATED : 27/03/2024.

¶9

This petition can be disposed of without going into the merits of the matter. The grievance raised in the present petition is about the implementation of Clause 9.2 of Government Resolution dated 19/10/2022 and in this respect the petitioner has already made two representations which are pending before the respondents and yet not decided by respondents. In absence of any decision on such representations, the reasons for denying such benefits are not coming forward and, therefore, we are of the opinion that it would be in the interest of justice to direct the respondents to decide the representation dated 10/05/2023.

¶10

Accordingly, we dispose of the writ petition with direction to the respondent No.2 to take a decision on the representation dated 10/05/2023 within two months from today.

¶11

2 31 wp 6061-2023

¶12

At the same time the respondent No.1 shall consider the present petition as a representation of the petitioner and take a decision on the same within two months.

¶13

Both the respondents shall communicate the decision independently to the petitioner within stipulated time.

¶14

The learned Counsel for the petitioner is directed to communicate this order to the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 along with the copy of petition, within one week.

¶15

JUDGE JUDGE

¶16

Jayashree..

Nagpur Vibhagiye Adharbhut Dhan Kharedi Federation, Thr. President, Namdeo Pandurang Kapgate v. State of Maha.,Thr Chief Secretary, Food, Civil Supplies and Cons. Protection Dept., Mumbai and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nagpur Vibhagiye Adharbhut Dhan Kharedi Federation, Thr. President, Namdeo Pandurang Kapgate v. State of Maha.,Thr Chief Secretary, Food, Civil Supplies and Cons. Protection Dept., Mumbai and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil S/O Shivkumar Dubey Vs Election Commission of India, Thr. Chief Election Commissioner and Secretary, New Delhi and Others

Inderjeet S/O Haridas Ramteke Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Public Works Dept. Mumbai and Another

Salman Khan Shafiullah Khan vs Pharmacy Council of India, Thr. Secretary, New Delhi and Others

Ashish Nanaji Badole Vs State of Maha. Thr. Its Ministry of Revenue and Forest, Mumbai and Others

Chetan S/O Maruti Pasare and Others vs the Western Coalfields Ltd., Wcl Head Quarter, Nagpur Thr. C.M.D. and Others

Akshay S/O. Ramesh Thakre and Others vs the Western Coalfields Ltd., Wcl Head Quarter, Nagpur Thr. C.M.D. and Others