Abdul Shakir Kadar Khan and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm 21-wp574.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 574 OF 2024
Abdul Shakir Kadar Khan & Anr. …..Petitioners
Vs.
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents
Mr. Shakshil Pangarkar for the Petitioners. Mr. V.N. Sagare APP, for the Respondent-State. Adv. Sufian Quzi for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 4th JULY, 2024.
P.C.:-
- Despite circulating the Petition, an adjournment is sought by the learned Advocate for the Petitioners on frivolous ground. We do not appreciate the practice adopted by the Petitioners.
- However, at the request of learned Advocate for the Petitioners, stand over to 1st August, 2024, subject to payment of cost of Rs.3,000/- to Kirtikar Law Library, High Court, Mumbai within a period of one week from today, failing which the Petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to this Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Abdul Shakir Kadar Khan
- respondent
The State Of Maharashtra
Coram
A. S. GADKARI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court