The High Court held that the writ petition was not maintainable because the impugned order was already subject to revision pending before the State Government. The petition was disposed of as not maintainable, noting the petitioner could approach the Division Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-wp5711-2024.doc
VRJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5711 OF 2024
VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV
Digitally signedby VAIBHAVRAMESH JADHAVDate: 2024.05.0614:28:42 +0530
Rajesh Laxmichand Shah … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra, Through the Deputy Controller of Rationing “E” Region, Mumbai & Anr. … Respondents
Pol Legal Juris for the petitioner. Ms. M. S. Srivastava, AGP for the State.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : MAY 6, 2024
P.C.:
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
1 issue framed by the court
Is a writ petition maintainable when the impugned order is already subject matter of revision pending before the State Government?
Vaibhav Ramesh Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
Deputy Controller of Rationing 'E' Region, Mumbai
Anr.
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
