Petitioner sought leave to withdraw his writ petition, having already pursued the alternate remedy available to him under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interests Act, 2002. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P1-ASWP-.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 29294 OF 2023
Vijendra Kumar Rai …Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Edelweiss Reconstruction Co. Ltd. …Respondent
Mr. Vijendra Kumar Rai, the Petitioner in-person.
CORAM : B. P. COLABAWALLA & SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 02, 2024
PC :
Digitally signed by ASHWINI ASHWINI JANARDAN JANARDAN VALLAKATI VALLAKATI Date: 2024.01.02 04:56:13 +0530
as withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Page 1 of 2 JANUARY 02, 2024
Ashwini Vallakati
P1-ASWP-.doc
[ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.]
[ B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]
Page 2 of 2 JANUARY 02, 2024
Ashwini Vallakati
Vijendra Kumar Rai
State of Maharashtra
Edelweiss Reconstruction Co. Ltd.
B. P. Colabawalla
Somasekhar Sundaresan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
