Petitioners counsel sought withdrawal of the writ petition as the parties were exploring settlement. The court permitted withdrawal with liberty to apply afresh if necessary and disposed of the petition.
Leave to withdraw with liberty to apply at a later stage if necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:983
PMB 10.wp.563-16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.563 OF 2016
RATNABEN NARAN GOHIL ..PETITIONER VS. PRAKASH MAHADEV PATVARDHAN AND ANR. ..RESPONDENTS
Adv. A. Majid Banderkar for the petitioner. Adv. Satish Adsul for respondent No.1. Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the State.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : JANUARY 10, 2024
P.C. :
that the parties are exploring a possibility of the settlement. In this view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this Writ Petition at this juncture. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to apply at a later stage if necessary.
1/1
Ratnaben Naran Gohil
Prakash Mahadev Patvardhan
Respondent No.2
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
