Writ petition where respondents could not be served, some having died, and petitioners sought repeated adjournments to take steps. The court found the petitioners were not interested in prosecuting the petition and dismissed it for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24-wp-5613-22.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Writ Petition (WP) No. 5613 of 2022
Shri Krushna Narayan Chavan and another Versus Ashok S/o Nilkanthrao Gadbail and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Ms. Pooja Bishit, Advocate h/f Shri P.V.Bansod, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Subhash Kalbande, Advocate for the respondent
CORAM : N.R.BORKAR, J. DATED : 25th NOVEMBER, 2024.
On 3rd February, 2023, notice issued to the respondent no.2 came to be returned back with an endorsement that he is no more and the notice issued to respondent no.4 came to be returned back for want of correct address. Thereafter, at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner the matter was adjourned from time to time.
SKNair
2 24-wp-5613-22.odt
SKNair
Shri Krushna Narayan Chavan
Ashok S/o Nilkanthrao Gadbail
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
