This court disposed of a writ petition where the petitioner proposed substituting a re-conciliator from the State Government panel after one refused the assignment. The court held that adherence to State Government directives binds all parties and found no further orders necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 560 of 2024
Maria S.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.560 OF 2024
LAKSHMI JAYASHANKAR AND ANR ... PETITIONERS
Versus
REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND 2 ORS
... RESPONDENTS
Mr Jatin Ramaiya, Advocate with Mr. Omkar Thakur, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. Siddharth Samant, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. S. Naik, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3.
CORAM:- BHARATI H. DANGRE & NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ.
DATED :- 24th March, 2025
P.C.
In the Petition which was disposed of by this Court on 21.10.2024, the Petitioner do not dispute that the re-conciliator was appointed from the panel prepared by the State Government. However, one of them refused the said assignment. In the wake of the same, the Petitioner propose to substitute the re-conciliator in terms of the directions issued by the State Government under Section 68 of the Goa Co-operative Housing Societies Act.
Page 1 of 2
24th March, 2025
WP 560 of 2024
In the wake of the aforesaid, no further orders are necessary.
NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, J. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.
Signed by: MARIA SUZANA REBELLO Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 25/03/2025 15:18:11
Page 2 of 2
24th March, 2025
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lakshmi Jayashankar and Another
Registrar of Co-operative Societies
Bharati H. Dangre
Nivedita P. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
